Scraping API Prices
Browse pages
Compare every productScraping APIsCloud browsersSERP and searchAI scraping APIsCost to scrape a targetGuidesQuestions & toolsHead to headShort answersCheapest for a jobFree tiersHow we check prices

Home / AgentQL / Alternatives

AgentQL alternatives

The first 12 comparable products for 200 metered browser-session hours a month, excluding separate proxy and model charges. Sorted by the published bill and amount, never by who pays us; the full category route includes every relevant product.

Exact12 substitutions priced0 cheaper than AgentQLLatest recorded source date 2026-07-26

The datum line

Not comparable hereWhat the rechecked AgentQL price gives for this job. Older prices do not produce comparative deltas.

The substitution

Browser hours200
Included in this billpublished session-time meter only
Alternatives without a total2

AgentQL has no exact bill for this workload, so the deltas below are absent rather than estimated. Each alternative still carries its own published figure and state.

Priced alternatives

BrowserCloud$99.00800,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 80% of what you buyAnchor Browser$200.00cheapest way to buy that: Starter plus 150 over the allowance at $1.00 each = $200.00 per monthBrowser Use Cloud$12.00Older price; excluded from rankings. cheapest way to buy that: Pay As You Go, $12.00 of metered usage = $12.00 per monthScrapeless$18.00Older price; excluded from rankings. cheapest way to buy that: Scraping Browser pay as you go, pay as you go at $0.09 per unit = $18.00 per monthLightpanda Cloud$19.00Older price; excluded from rankings. 100 of the included allowance goes unused, 33% of what you buyHyperbrowser$30.00Older price; excluded from rankings. 10,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 33% of what you buyBrowserbase$32.00Older price; excluded from rankings. cheapest way to buy that: Developer plus 100 over the allowance at $0.12 each = $32.00 per monthBrowserless$33.00Older price; excluded from rankings. cheapest way to buy that: Prototyping at $25.00 effective monthly with annual billing plus 4,000 over the allowance at $0.002 each = $33.00 per monthZenRows$69.99Older price; excluded from rankings. 249,800 of the included allowance goes unused, 100% of what you buyFirecrawl$99.00Older price; excluded from rankings. 76,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 76% of what you buyApifyNot priced for this workloadOlder price; excluded from rankings. no published rate for browser.session_timeBright Data Browser APINot priced for this workloadOlder price; excluded from rankings. no published rate for browser.session_time

See all 21 products in this category →

This comparison starts with structured extraction from a successfully fetched page. Products that cannot return that result stay outside the price order. Every displayed bill, meter, reason, source link, and verification date comes from the current dataset at build time.

Use the switching reason beside each eligible alternative to decide whether its billing model or operating constraint fits better than AgentQL. An unpublished total remains unknown.

The condition that decides it

Model extraction calls and remote-browser time separately before choosing from the table. AgentQL records both meters, but its public page does not say whether they are always additive, and its plans also limit calls per minute and concurrent browser sessions. Browse AI instead meters robot work through tasks, rows, screenshots, captured text, detail pages, and site-specific minimums. Firecrawl gives structured extraction its own page meter and also documents a token-based Extract path. The deciding question is therefore whether the workload is one extraction call, a browser-backed call, a robot task, or token-priced extraction. (AgentQL, retrieved 2026-07-25; Browse AI credit guide, retrieved 2026-07-26; Firecrawl extraction guide, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Who should stay with AgentQL

Stay when extraction calls and remote-browser use belong in one account, the published call-rate and session-concurrency limits fit the queue, and the team can measure both forms of usage. AgentQL is also the defensible incumbent when fully managed datasets or dedicated cloud or on-premises deployment are requirements, because those enterprise options sit outside the page-extraction bill ranked here. (AgentQL, retrieved 2026-07-25.)

What the alternatives do not replace

A comparable structured-page result does not establish a drop-in replacement for AgentQL’s browser path, deployment choices, or managed-dataset service. Browse AI brings robot tasks, website allowances, and retained task data; Firecrawl combines scraping, crawling, search, browser use, and extraction in a shared credit system. Those are different operating models, so verify query and output schemas, browser ownership, data retention, and deployment before treating the table total as a migration verdict. (Browse AI plan guide, retrieved 2026-07-26; Firecrawl pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; AgentQL, retrieved 2026-07-25.)