All products / Spider.cloud

Spider.cloud pricing

How Spider.cloud separates pay-as-you-go bandwidth and CPU time from flat concurrency plans, with the remaining gaps.

Not comparablePrice recorded on 2026-07-26Older price from 2026-07-26; excluded from rankings1 vendor sourceSee the calculation
Available volumes

Every available option was priced in advance from published vendor rules. Changing a control only switches between those checked options; nothing is sent anywhere and no account is needed.

Your job

Workload100,000 pages per month
JavaScript renderingrequired
Bills failed fetchesno
per 1,000 pages keptnot computable for this state

What Spider.cloud counts

Nothing to count: Spider.cloud publishes no rate for a page fetch. Its 2 published billing meters price other work.

What you pay

Not comparable hereNot comparableThis product publishes no rate for this kind of work.no purchasable offerno published rate for request.basic
  1. Successes you want

    100,000 pages

    Your stated workload. Every vendor on this site is priced against this same number.

  2. × 1

    Attempts you are billed for

    100,000 requests

    Spider.cloud does not bill failed fetches, so failures cost nothing here.

  3. Cash per month

    Not comparable here

    no published rate for request.basic

Bars share one linear scale across the 2 counted stages, so a multiplier shows as length. Units differ by stage and are labelled. Cash is not on that scale.

Not comparable. This product publishes no rate for this kind of work.

no published rate for request.basic

This is a finding about what Spider.cloud publishes, not a gap in the data. It stays visible so a definitive market claim cannot quietly ignore it.

Published exact bills for comparable products

Same 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month at a 95% success rate, ranked by what you would actually be billed. Unknown totals never enter the numeric order.

Every Spider.cloud plan

Published plans, with the offer this workload actually selects marked
PlanMonthlyIf billed yearlyPrepaid packIncludedSimultaneous sessions
Pay as you goNot publishedn/an/an/an/a
Unlimited 2 concurrency$40.00n/an/an/a2
Unlimited 10 concurrency$170.00n/an/an/a10
Unlimited 25 concurrency$350.00n/an/an/a25
Unlimited 50 concurrency$650.00n/an/an/a50
Unlimited 1539 concurrency$20,000.00n/an/an/a1539

What consumes a unit

This is where a bill actually grows. One operation is not one billed unit, and the multiplier is published here rather than on the pricing page.

Every published way Spider.cloud charges
OperationCostsPerSource
proxy.datacenter_bandwidth1 usdgbsource
compute.unit0.001 usdnot publishedsource

What Spider.cloud does not publish

What Spider.cloud is

Spider.cloud provides crawl, scrape, search, and browser-capable web data endpoints for AI agents and data pipelines. It can return page content and structured or LLM-oriented output while offering JavaScript, stealth, proxy, and AI-related options. It is for developers who want a hosted crawler and scraper but still want a choice between granular infrastructure usage and flat request capacity. Sources: Spider.cloud and Spider.cloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.

Firecrawl, Zyte API, and Apify are the nearest named comparisons. Firecrawl uses operation-specific credits for scrape, crawl, map, search, and extraction; Zyte bills successful requests through target-difficulty tiers and add-ons; Apify charges a platform balance for compute, storage, transfer, proxies, and Actor events. Spider.cloud’s distinguishing choice is between pay-as-you-go bandwidth plus CPU time and Unlimited plans tied to concurrent requests. Sources: Firecrawl pricing, Zyte pricing, Apify pricing, and Spider.cloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.

How billing works

There are two materially different models. Pay-as-you-go adds incoming bandwidth and CPU minutes, so one page has no universal unit cost: page weight and processing time multiply usage. Prepaid top-up balances do not expire. Unlimited replaces those per-request infrastructure meters with a flat plan determined by purchased concurrency and includes standard JavaScript, stealth, and proxy use, while AI features remain separately metered and geolocation is not included. Failed requests are not charged, and Unlimited requests above the concurrency ceiling receive HTTP 429 instead of queueing. The common buying mistake is to treat the vendor’s illustrative basic-scrape amount as a fixed per-page rate, or to assume Unlimited also covers AI features and geolocation. Source: Spider.cloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.

What Spider.cloud does not publish cleanly

  • The amount of free signup balance. Source reviewed: Spider.cloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.
  • One reconciled Unlimited entry point. The page headline and the detailed concurrency scale show different starting statements. Source reviewed: Spider.cloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.
  • A simple per-page conversion for CPU minutes and incoming bandwidth, because both depend on the fetched page and processing path. Source reviewed: Spider.cloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.

Who it suits

Spider.cloud suits teams that can measure page weight and CPU time or that have stable enough concurrency to choose Unlimited. It is less suitable when procurement needs one fixed cost per fetched page, or when AI and geolocation must be assumed part of the flat plan. The reason is that the two buying modes optimize for different workload shapes and should not be blended in one estimate. Sources: Spider.cloud and pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.

Answer

What Spider.cloud costs, what it publishes, and what it does not. Every figure sourced and dated.

Recorded 2026-07-26 from the vendor's own pricing page.We could not confirm this price in the latest check, so it remains visible for context but cannot lead a price ranking. Check the vendor's pricing page before buying.