Scraping API PricesAll products / Hyperbrowser
Hyperbrowser pricing
How Hyperbrowser credits cover browsers, fetch, search, extraction, and proxies, what is not public, and who fits.
Every available option was priced in advance from published vendor rules. Changing a control only switches between those checked options; nothing is sent anywhere and no account is needed.
Your job
What Hyperbrowser counts
What you pay
Successes you want
100,000 pages
Your stated workload. Every vendor on this site is priced against this same number.
- ÷ 0.95
Attempts you are billed for
105,263 requests
Hyperbrowser bills failed fetches, so a 5% failure rate is billed work.
- × 1
What the meter counts
105,263 credits
One attempt is one billed unit for this workload.
- =
Cash per month
$105.26 /mo
Startup. Cheapest of every eligible purchase option, not the first plan that fits.
Bars share one linear scale across the 3 counted stages, so a multiplier shows as length. Units differ by stage and are labelled. Cash is not on that scale.
100,000 pages divided by 95% success → 105,263 credit → Startup $105.26/mo = $1.05 per 1,000 pages kept
The arithmetic, line by line
- pages: 1 credit per pagesource
- request.js_render: no multiplier published, treated as included
- billed on up to 105,263 attempts, not 100,000 successes, because failure billing is not published; conservatively assumes every attempt consumes quotasource
- consumes 105,263.16 credit per month
- cheapest way to buy that: Startup plus 75,263 over the allowance at $0.001 each = $105.26 per monthsource
Cheaper for this job
Same 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month at a 95% success rate, ranked by what you would actually be billed. Unknown totals never enter the numeric order.
Every Hyperbrowser plan
| Plan | Monthly | If billed yearly | Prepaid pack | Included | Simultaneous sessions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Startup your job | $30.00 | n/a | n/a | 30,000 credit | 25 |
| Scale | $100.00 | n/a | n/a | 100,000 credit | 100 |
What consumes a unit
This is where a bill actually grows. One operation is not one billed unit, and the multiplier is published here rather than on the pricing page.
| Operation | Costs | Per | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| browser.session_time | 100 credit | browser_hour | source |
| proxy.residential_bandwidth | 10000 credit | gb | source |
| request.basic | 1 credit | page | source |
| request.residential_proxy | 9 credit | page | source |
| request.ai_extraction | 0.03 credit | token | source |
| search.query | 5 credit | search | source |
What Hyperbrowser does not publish
- Failure billing is not published.
- The billing docs do not state whether CAPTCHA solving has a separate usage meter.
What Hyperbrowser is
Hyperbrowser combines hosted browser sessions with Fetch, structured extraction, and Search APIs. It is intended for developers building browser agents or web data workflows who want both browser infrastructure and higher-level endpoints from one provider. Browserbase, Firecrawl, and Browserless are the nearest named comparisons. Hyperbrowser’s commercial distinction is a common credit balance with a published fixed credit value, used across browser time, proxy bandwidth, fetched pages, JSON extraction, and search queries. Sources: Hyperbrowser, Hyperbrowser pricing, Hyperbrowser billing documentation, Browserbase pricing, Firecrawl pricing, and Browserless pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.
How billing works
One credit is the shared accounting unit. Browser sessions consume credits according to elapsed time, measured at fine granularity, while built-in residential proxy use consumes credits according to transferred bandwidth. A basic Fetch page has a base credit cost, and proxy use or JSON output can add credits to it. Search has a per-query meter, with location-aware search consuming more. Structured JSON extraction can introduce token-based usage. The common buying mistake is to assume that equal credit counts represent equal outputs. A credit can represent part of a browser session, part of a proxied transfer, a page operation, or token processing, so workload composition controls the result. Source: Hyperbrowser billing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.
What Hyperbrowser does not publish
- Whether failed browser sessions or failed Fetch pages consume credits. Source reviewed: Hyperbrowser billing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.
- Whether CAPTCHA solving has a separate usage meter or is absorbed into another meter. Sources reviewed: Hyperbrowser pricing and billing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.
- A single output conversion from credits to completed pages when browser time, proxy data, and extraction are combined. Source reviewed: Hyperbrowser billing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.
- A public annual self-serve plan rate on the reviewed plan page. Source reviewed: Hyperbrowser pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.
Who it suits
Hyperbrowser suits engineering teams that want both managed browsers and lightweight Fetch, Search, or extraction endpoints, and that can allocate credits by feature in their telemetry. It is less suitable for a buyer who needs success-only treatment across every endpoint, or who wants one predictable page unit for browser-backed extraction with residential traffic. The reason is the additive model: browser time and proxy bandwidth remain independent, and Fetch modifiers or extraction tokens can change the credit total. Sources: Hyperbrowser pricing and Hyperbrowser billing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.
Answer
Hyperbrowser's dated 2026-07-25 price snapshot gives $105.26 for 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages on its Startup offer. This older figure is excluded from rankings; check the vendor before buying.
Recorded 2026-07-25 from the vendor's own pricing page.We could not confirm this price in the latest check, so it remains visible for context but cannot lead a price ranking. Check the vendor's pricing page before buying.