Scraping API Prices
MenuClose

Search the site

75 providers, their alternatives and head-to-heads, targets, guides and answers

Home / Web search APIs / Microsoft Bing Search API / Alternatives

Microsoft Bing Search API alternatives

Microsoft Bing Search API has no public price for 100,000 searches a month, so no saving can be worked out against it. The lowest complete bills for the same job are TinyFish at $0.00, Search1API at $99.00, Parallel Web Systems Search API at $100.00.

Why Microsoft Bing Search API has no price here: Microsoft retired and decommissioned Bing Search APIs on August 11, 2025. Grounding with Bing Search is an agent-grounding product, not a drop-in raw Search API.

Prices read on each vendor's own pricing page; dates on every row. How we check prices

The lowest bills for 100,000 searches a month

The whole job priced the way each vendor sells it.

  1. TinyFish $0.00 a month Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check TinyFish's pricing
  2. Search1API $99.00 a month Professional plan · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Search1API's pricing
  3. Parallel Web Systems Search API $100.00 a month Turbo Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Parallel Web Systems Search API's pricing
  4. Nimble $110.00 a month Pay as you go · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Nimble's pricing
  5. Desearch $179.00 a month Starter plan · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Desearch's pricing

Pay as you go, no plan to outgrow

Nothing unused at the end of the month, and no cliff at a plan boundary.

  1. TinyFish $0.00 at this volume Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check TinyFish's pricing
  2. Parallel Web Systems Search API $100.00 at this volume Turbo Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Parallel Web Systems Search API's pricing
  3. Nimble $110.00 at this volume Pay as you go · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Nimble's pricing
  4. Brave Search API $500.00 at this volume Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Brave Search API's pricing
  5. Google Custom Search JSON API $500.00 at this volume Additional queries for existing customers · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Google Custom Search JSON API's pricing

All 22 web search APIs, priced for any job you set →

Why teams leave Microsoft Bing Search API

This is no longer an ordinary price-driven switch. Microsoft retired Bing Search APIs and decommissioned existing instances on August 11, 2025. New signup is unavailable, so there is no request volume at which keeping the legacy API becomes a defensible production choice. Microsoft directs customers to Grounding with Bing Search, but that replacement is part of an Azure AI agent workflow rather than a drop-in raw search-results API. (Microsoft Bing Search API retirement notice, checked 2026-07-27.)

That product boundary is the real reason to compare alternatives. Grounding with Bing Search returns summarized web information for an agent, does not expose raw Bing output directly to another application, and requires citations plus a link to the Bing query in the end-user experience. Teams that need a result array for rank tracking, indexing, research storage, or their own reranking logic need a raw or structured search API instead of treating Microsoft’s agent tool as the same product under a new name. (Microsoft Bing APIs, checked 2026-07-27.)

Alternatives worth considering

  • Brave Search API: Consider it when the migration needs an independently operated web index and structured web or news results rather than agent-generated prose. Brave also separates Search from its Answers product, which makes it possible to buy result retrieval without automatically changing the application into a cited-answer workflow. (Brave Search API, checked 2026-07-26.)

  • SerpApi: Look here when engine and result-type coverage matters more than preserving a Microsoft relationship. SerpApi exposes Bing alongside Google and many specialized search engines, and its allowance counts successful searches while excluding cached, errored, and failed searches. That is a clearer replacement boundary for applications that consume structured SERP records. (SerpApi pricing, checked 2026-07-26; SerpApi Bing Search API, checked 2026-07-27.)

  • SearchApi.io: Consider it when the application needs structured results from Bing and other search engines under a monthly successful-response allowance. A successful HTTP response consumes a request, while failed requests do not. Review its retention and redistribution terms separately because a compatible response shape does not establish compatible downstream data rights. (SearchApi.io pricing, checked 2026-07-26; SearchApi.io Bing Search API, checked 2026-07-27.)

  • DataForSEO SERP API: Look here when queue choice, result depth, or search-operator usage needs to be priced explicitly. DataForSEO offers standard, priority, and live task delivery, adds consumption for deeper result sets and selected parameters, and returns funds reserved for failed tasks. This is useful when the old Bing integration was part of a scheduled data pipeline rather than an interactive agent. (DataForSEO SERP API pricing, checked 2026-07-26; DataForSEO cost explanation, checked 2026-07-26.)

  • Tavily: Consider it when the desired replacement really is agent-oriented search plus optional extraction, mapping, crawling, and research. Tavily meters basic and advanced search differently and uses separate rules for its other operations, so it is a product redesign rather than a raw Bing response substitute. (Tavily API credits, checked 2026-07-26.)

Who should stay with Microsoft’s Bing stack

No production team should stay on the retired Bing Search API because the service is unavailable. Staying in Microsoft’s stack can still be correct when the actual job is to ground an Azure AI agent, the application can present Microsoft’s required citations and query link, and direct access to raw search output is unnecessary. In that case, Grounding with Bing Search is the intended successor and avoids introducing a separate search vendor solely to supply context to the agent. (Microsoft Bing Search API retirement notice, checked 2026-07-27; Microsoft Bing APIs, checked 2026-07-27.)

What the alternatives do not replace

None of these alternatives preserves the retired API by implication. Response fields, market and language parameters, result types, legal terms, caching rules, and request authentication all need a new integration review. The raw-result providers also do not reproduce Grounding with Bing Search’s Azure agent attachment or its Microsoft-specific citation workflow. Conversely, agent-search products do not automatically provide the stable raw records expected by a SERP ingestion pipeline. The safe migration test is output equivalence and permitted use, not merely whether both services accept a query string. (Microsoft Bing APIs, checked 2026-07-27; SerpApi Bing Search API, checked 2026-07-27; SearchApi.io Bing Search API, checked 2026-07-27.)