Scraping API PricesScrape.do vs ScrapeOps
The current volume and workload boundaries between Scrape.do and ScrapeOps.
Scrape.do
ScrapeOps
The difference
Both paths, one ruler
Scrape.do
Successes you want
100,000 pages
Your stated workload. Every vendor on this site is priced against this same number.
- × 1
Attempts you are billed for
100,000 requests
Scrape.do does not bill failed fetches, so failures cost nothing here.
- × 5
What the meter counts
500,000 credits
One attempt is not one billed unit here: this workload multiplies by 5 before any money is involved.
- =
Cash per month
$99.00 /mo
Pro. Cheapest of every eligible purchase option, not the first plan that fits.
Bars share one linear scale across the 3 counted stages, so a multiplier shows as length. Units differ by stage and are labelled. Cash is not on that scale.
ScrapeOps
Successes you want
100,000 pages
Your stated workload. Every vendor on this site is priced against this same number.
- × 1
Attempts you are billed for
100,000 requests
ScrapeOps does not bill failed fetches, so failures cost nothing here.
- × 10
What the meter counts
1,000,000 credits
One attempt is not one billed unit here: this workload multiplies by 10 before any money is involved.
- =
Cash per month
$99.00 /mo
1M. Cheapest of every eligible purchase option, not the first plan that fits.
Bars share one linear scale across the 3 counted stages, so a multiplier shows as length. Units differ by stage and are labelled. Cash is not on that scale.
Both ladders share one linear scale, topping out at 1,000,000 counted units, so a longer bar means more billed work rather than a different drawing.
These figures are for one stated workload: 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month at a 95% success rate. This site has not computed a crossover volume for this pair, and does not claim one. Move the volume on either product page to see where the answer moves.
Decision boundary: for one-credit basic requests, ScrapeOps has the lower computed bill through 100,000 requests, and the bills tie from 100,001 through 250,000. ScrapeOps is lower from 250,001 through 500,000, the bills tie from 500,001 through 1,000,000, Scrape.do is lower from 1,000,001 through 1,250,000, ScrapeOps is lower from 1,250,001 through 2,000,000, and the bills tie from 2,000,001 through ScrapeOps’ last published allowance of 3,000,000. (Scrape.do pricing, ScrapeOps pricing, retrieved July 26, 2026)
Rendering does not preserve those exact request counts. Scrape.do publishes a five-credit datacenter-plus-rendering bundle, while ScrapeOps publishes five-credit cheap JavaScript and ten-credit normal JavaScript modes. Residential-plus-rendering costs twenty-five credits at both vendors in the reviewed combination tables, but ScrapeOps also offers mobile-plus-rendering and several premium or anti-bot bundles. The correct boundary depends on which JavaScript mode is actually required. (Scrape.do request costs, ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)
Billing models side by side
Scrape.do sells monthly credits. Basic datacenter requests cost one credit, rendered datacenter requests five, residential or mobile requests ten, and residential or mobile rendering twenty-five. Ready-made target APIs and AI extraction use separate replacement costs. Its paid plans publish concurrency pools, while asynchronous calls are limited to thirty percent of the regular concurrency pool. (Scrape.do pricing, Scrape.do request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)
ScrapeOps also sells monthly credits, using a more granular plan ladder through 3,000,000 credits. Basic requests cost one credit, while JavaScript, residential, mobile, AI extraction, CAPTCHA, target, premium, and anti-bot options select replacement or additive meters. There is no pay-as-you-go overage and no rollover, but an account can be configured to renew, upgrade, or block at exhaustion. (ScrapeOps pricing, ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)
Scrape.do bills HTTP 2xx, 400, 404, and 410 responses, while other failed or blocked responses are not charged. ScrapeOps bills HTTP 200 and 404 responses and does not charge other failed responses. A workload with many client errors should map status codes separately because the two billable sets are not the same. (Scrape.do request costs, ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)
What each provides that the other does not
Scrape.do is the only one of this pair whose reviewed billing guide says per-domain defaults may select a stricter bundle and exposes an authoritative request-cost response header. It also publishes ready-made Amazon and Google request costs and treats mobile and residential routing alike in its base table. (Scrape.do request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)
ScrapeOps is the only one of this pair whose reviewed table exposes multiple premium levels, generic bypass levels, PerimeterX, DataDome, CAPTCHA, LinkedIn, and an additive LLM-extraction meter. Its smaller plan steps also create lower entry bands and several ties with Scrape.do. (ScrapeOps request costs, ScrapeOps pricing, retrieved July 26, 2026)
Who should pick which
Pick ScrapeOps in its lower basic-request bands or when explicit premium, mobile, CAPTCHA, anti-bot, target, or AI combinations match the workload. Pick Scrape.do in the 1,000,001-to-1,250,000 basic band, when domain-specific defaults are useful, or when recording the observed request-cost header is important. In every tie band, compare concurrency and the required feature bundle rather than choosing by brand. (Scrape.do pricing, ScrapeOps pricing, Scrape.do request costs, ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)
The unverified points are Scrape.do’s complete live per-domain default-cost table and ScrapeOps’ combination representation for replacement bundles plus additive AI. Test the dominant request shapes and capture actual credit debits before applying the basic boundaries to a mixed production workload. (Scrape.do request costs, ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved July 26, 2026)