Scraping API Prices
MenuClose

Search the site

75 providers, their alternatives and head-to-heads, targets, guides and answers

Home / Web search APIs / Kagi Search API / Alternatives

Kagi Search API alternatives

17 APIs are cheaper than Kagi Search API for 100,000 searches a month: TinyFish costs $0.00, $1,200.00 a month less than Kagi Search API's $1,200.00.

Prices read on each vendor's own pricing page; dates on every row. How we check prices

The lowest bills for 100,000 searches a month

The whole job priced the way each vendor sells it.

  1. TinyFish $0.00 a month saves $1,200.00 a month · Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check TinyFish's pricing
  2. Search1API $99.00 a month saves $1,101.00 a month · Professional plan · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Search1API's pricing
  3. Parallel Web Systems Search API $100.00 a month saves $1,100.00 a month · Turbo Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Parallel Web Systems Search API's pricing
  4. Nimble $110.00 a month saves $1,090.00 a month · Pay as you go · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Nimble's pricing
  5. Desearch $179.00 a month saves $1,021.00 a month · Starter plan · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Desearch's pricing

Pay as you go, no plan to outgrow

Nothing unused at the end of the month, and no cliff at a plan boundary.

  1. TinyFish $0.00 at this volume saves $1,200.00 a month · Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check TinyFish's pricing
  2. Parallel Web Systems Search API $100.00 at this volume saves $1,100.00 a month · Turbo Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Parallel Web Systems Search API's pricing
  3. Nimble $110.00 at this volume saves $1,090.00 a month · Pay as you go · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Nimble's pricing
  4. Brave Search API $500.00 at this volume saves $700.00 a month · Search · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Brave Search API's pricing
  5. Google Custom Search JSON API $500.00 at this volume saves $700.00 a month · Additional queries for existing customers · checked Oct 9, 2026 Check Google Custom Search JSON API's pricing

All 22 web search APIs, priced for any job you set →

When switching is justified

The clearest trigger is the billing rule, not a small difference in the table. Linkup documents that errors, missing parameters, internal errors, and responses with no relevant result do not consume credit, while Kagi does not publish whether failed searches are billed. Parallel and Perplexity also leave failed-request billing unpublished, so they do not remove that uncertainty. If success-only billing is a procurement requirement, Linkup is the alternative here with a recorded answer. (Linkup pricing, checked 2026-07-26; Kagi API pricing, checked 2026-07-26; Parallel pricing, checked 2026-07-26; Perplexity pricing, checked 2026-07-26.)

Who should stay with Kagi

Stay when the job is only standard web search, the current output already fits the application, and pay-per-query invoicing is preferable to managing prepaid credit or choosing among search processors. Staying is also reasonable for a buyer already negotiating Kagi’s custom volume pricing or rate limits. The condition is that the team can accept a public-preview product whose standard rate limit, failed-request treatment, and customer-side caching or redistribution rules are not published on the reviewed pages. (Kagi API overview, checked 2026-07-26; Kagi changelog, checked 2026-07-26.)

What a switch gives up

Linkup’s record describes prepaid requests and Parallel’s describes processor-based pay-as-you-go usage, not Kagi’s time-or-balance invoice flow. A move also replaces the existing response contract and query behavior, neither of which the cost table tests. Treat the calculated totals as a purchasing comparison, then validate output fields and search fit on the application’s own queries before changing providers. (Linkup pricing, checked 2026-07-26; Parallel pricing, checked 2026-07-26; Kagi Search API reference, checked 2026-07-26.)