Scraping API Prices
Browse pages
Compare every productScraping APIsCloud browsersSERP and searchAI scraping APIsCost to scrape a targetGuidesQuestions & toolsHead to headShort answersCheapest for a jobFree tiersHow we check prices

Home / Nimble / Alternatives

Nimble alternatives

The first 12 comparable products for 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month at a 95% success rate. Sorted by the published bill and amount, never by who pays us; the full category route includes every relevant product.

Exact12 substitutions priced0 cheaper than NimbleLatest recorded source date 2026-07-26

The datum line

Not comparable hereWhat the rechecked Nimble price gives for this job. Older prices do not produce comparative deltas.

The substitution

Pages per month100,000
JavaScript renderingrequired
Assumed success rate95%
Alternatives without a total0

Nimble has no exact bill for this workload, so the deltas below are absent rather than estimated. Each alternative still carries its own published figure and state.

Priced alternatives

HasData$99.00cheapest way to buy that: Business, 1,000,000 included = $99.00 per monthOlostep$99.00100,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 50% of what you buyScrape.do$99.00750,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 60% of what you buyScrapeOwl$99.00473,684 of the included allowance goes unused, 47% of what you buyWebScraping.AI$99.00500,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 50% of what you buyBrowserCloud$19.0014,737 of the included allowance goes unused, 12% of what you buyScrappa$50.00 prepaid80,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 44% of what you buyScrapingBot$99.00573,684 of the included allowance goes unused, 52% of what you buyScraping Robot$180.00cheapest way to buy that: Business pay-as-you-go, pay as you go at $0.0018 per unit = $180.00 per monthBrowsable$249.0019,737 of the included allowance goes unused, 16% of what you buyScrapingAnt$249.002,000,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 67% of what you buyDecodo Web Scraping API$49.00Older price; excluded from rankings. 63,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 39% of what you buy

See all 39 products in this category →

Why teams leave Nimble

Nimble can become the wrong fit when a buyer needs to choose the billable route before sending a request. Its Extract, Crawl, and Map usage is charged by the rendering driver, and Nimble normally selects that driver automatically, so a page can move from standard retrieval to JavaScript or stealth treatment without the caller making that choice. The self-serve path charges only successful requests and has no commitment, but the managed Data Services path is billed annually, its monthly page credits expire at month end, and its published tiers cap both retained data and concurrent agents. A team with a spiky managed workload, a strict per-job budget, or retention needs beyond the selected tier therefore has a concrete reason to compare alternatives. (Nimble pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Alternatives worth considering

This is a set of direct standard-page substitutes, not a ranking. Each option below exposes a basic page-fetch route in the current vendor record. Products that only sell browser time, compute, or structured extraction are discussed separately because substituting them changes the job.

  • Bright Data Web Unlocker: Look here when the problem is wanting a successful-request meter for unlocking a page, with bandwidth, proxy handling, and CAPTCHA handling presented as part of Web Unlocker rather than an automatically selected rendering-driver ladder. Its Web Scraper API is a different delivered-record product, so confirm which output you need. (Bright Data Web Unlocker pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • BrowserCloud: Consider it when page scrapes must share an account with screenshots, PDFs, proxy bandwidth, and interactive browser sessions. The tradeoff is a shared credit pool whose public page does not define failed-page billing or how combined meters behave. (BrowserCloud pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Crawlbase: Consider it when you want pay-as-you-go retrieval with separate JavaScript treatment and billing only when page content is delivered. Crawlbase assigns a domain-complexity tier, so this solves the commitment problem but not every form of route-selection uncertainty. (Crawlbase pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Decodo Web Scraping API: Look here when you prefer monthly plans with published modes for standard or premium proxy access, with or without JavaScript, and charges limited to successfully retrieved results. (Decodo Web Scraping API pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Firecrawl: Consider it when the real job is broader than fetching HTML and includes crawling, search, markdown, extraction, or browser sessions under one credit balance. A target page that itself returns a client or server error can still consume credits, so its failure rule is not equivalent to Nimble’s. (Firecrawl pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; Firecrawl scrape API, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Hyperbrowser: Look here when browser automation, Fetch, structured extraction, and search need to sit in the same account. Directly purchased credits have a published expiry, while failure billing for Fetch and browser sessions is not public. (Hyperbrowser pricing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Olostep: Consider it when a standard scrape should already include JavaScript rendering and residential routing instead of escalating through separately described drivers. It bills successfully completed requests, while top-up credits have a fixed validity period. (Olostep, retrieved 2026-07-26; Olostep scrape documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Oxylabs Web Scraper API: Look here when you want distinct published treatment for Google, Amazon, other sites, and JavaScript rendering. Its billable-success definition includes target responses in both the success and client-error status families, so compare the status codes your workload commonly returns. (Oxylabs Web Scraper API pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Scrape.do: Consider it when you want explicit request bundles for datacenter, residential, mobile, rendering, and ready-made target APIs. It bills several target response statuses as successful, and the complete live per-domain cost table was not obtainable from the public page. (Scrape.do request costs, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapeNinja: Look here when separate rendered and non-rendered quotas through RapidAPI fit an existing procurement path. The public sources do not define whether a failed or blocked call consumes quota, so it does not replace Nimble’s documented success-only rule. (ScrapeNinja documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScrapeNinja on RapidAPI, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapeOps: Consider it when the useful product is a proxy aggregator with published combinations for rendering, proxy pools, anti-bot work, targets, and extraction. It offers explicit exhaustion behaviors but no credit rollover or general pay-as-you-go overage. (ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScraperAPI: Look here when one API must cover standard pages, JavaScript, premium routing, screenshots, stealth, and several named targets. Monthly credits do not roll over, and lower plans stop at their allowance unless upgraded, so it favors a predictable recurring workload more than a spiky one. (ScraperAPI pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScraperAPI credit rules, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Scrapfly: Consider it when you want a basic datacenter request plus separately visible residential and JavaScript additions. Its failure protection has exceptions and can be disabled when eligible failures form too much of recent traffic, so review that rule before treating it as success-only billing. (Scrapfly billing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingAnt: Look here when monthly credits and explicit combinations of rendering and residential routing are preferable to automatic driver selection. The vendor describes blocked and error responses as unbilled, but its public statements about concurrency do not fully reconcile. (ScrapingAnt credit costs, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScrapingAnt pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingBee: Consider it when HTML retrieval, JavaScript, premium routing, stealth, AI extraction, Google, and commerce targets should draw from one monthly balance. JavaScript rendering is enabled by default and changes consumption unless disabled, and credits do not roll over. (ScrapingBee credit guide, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingDog: Look here when named search, commerce, social, screenshot, rendering, and extraction endpoints matter more than Nimble’s integrated Map, Crawl, and Agent model. The vendor says failed requests are not charged, but it does not publish a complete status-code definition. (ScrapingDog pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScrapingDog documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingFish: Consider it for a simple request-pack model in which JavaScript and proxy routing use the same request rate. It is a narrower substitute because public geotargeting is limited to Poland or the European Union and the service says it does not provide automatic CAPTCHA or anti-bot bypass. (ScrapingFish, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • SOAX Web Data API: Look here when rendering, proxy routing, and anti-bot handling should be presented as included in a request allowance rather than separate multipliers. The current public pages do not expose enough of the request billing unit, failure billing, or over-quota behavior for an exact normalized comparison. (SOAX Web Data API, retrieved 2026-07-26; SOAX pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • WebScrapingAPI: Consider it when JavaScript, residential routing, geotargeting, and CAPTCHA handling should be included features and a plan-level concurrency figure matters. Its current pricing page and first-party quick-start guide publish incompatible plan tables, so procurement still needs confirmation. (WebScrapingAPI pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; WebScrapingAPI quick start, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ZenRows: Look here when you want a visible ladder for basic, JavaScript, premium, and stealth requests plus an optional scraping-browser route. Failed requests and internal retries are free, but monthly balance does not roll over and current first-party pages disagree on one business tier. (ZenRows pricing documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26; ZenRows pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Zyte API: Consider it when target-difficulty tiers, browser rendering, screenshots, and extraction add-ons match the way you want to buy. Zyte bills an API response as successful in some cases where the target returns a non-ban bad status or requested extraction data is missing, so its success boundary is broader than Nimble’s short pricing-page statement. (Zyte API pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; Zyte API errors, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Apify, Cloudflare Browser Rendering, Lightpanda, and Spider.cloud can all participate in page-retrieval systems, but their recorded baseline meters are compute, browser time, bandwidth, or concurrency rather than a standard successful page. Diffbot and ScrapeGraphAI focus the recorded meter on extraction, crawl, markdown, search, or AI output. They are valid architecture changes, not clean replacements for the page job priced here. (Apify pricing, Cloudflare Browser Rendering pricing, Lightpanda pricing, Spider.cloud pricing, Diffbot pricing, and ScrapeGraphAI, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Who should stay with Nimble

Stay when automatic driver selection is a benefit rather than a budgeting problem, especially when the same workflow needs standard fetches, JavaScript rendering, stealth handling, browser actions, parsing, screenshots, geotargeting, Map, Crawl, Search, or agents through one platform. Self-serve use has no commitment and charges only successful requests. A steady managed workload can also justify Data Services when its annual billing, monthly credit expiry, agent allowance, and retention window fit the operating plan. (Nimble Extract documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26; Nimble pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

What the alternatives do not replace

No row in the standard-page table should be read as a promise that the alternative reproduces Nimble’s whole product. Nimble’s public documentation puts Extract, Map, Crawl, Search, AI-generated Answer, custom and maintained agents, media download, residential proxy access, and managed Data Services behind the same platform and documents automatic driver selection across several extraction routes. Individual alternatives overlap with parts of that bundle, but the comparison engine prices one successful standard page only. Replacing Nimble therefore requires a separate check for output formats, browser actions, network capture, agent maintenance, delivery, storage, and the commercial terms attached to each added product. (Nimble pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; Nimble Extract documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)