Scraping API Prices
Browse pages
Compare every productScraping APIsCloud browsersSERP and searchAI scraping APIsCost to scrape a targetGuidesQuestions & toolsHead to headShort answersCheapest for a jobFree tiersHow we check prices

Home / ScrapingBot / Alternatives

ScrapingBot alternatives

The first 12 comparable products for 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month at a 95% success rate. Sorted by the published bill and amount, never by who pays us; the full category route includes every relevant product.

Assumption-dependent12 substitutions priced2 cheaper than ScrapingBotLatest recorded source date 2026-07-26

The datum line

$99.00What the rechecked ScrapingBot price gives for this job. Older prices do not produce comparative deltas.

The substitution

Pages per month100,000
JavaScript renderingrequired
Assumed success rate95%
Alternatives without a total0

Priced alternatives

HasData$99.00same bill. cheapest way to buy that: Business, 1,000,000 included = $99.00 per monthOlostep$99.00same bill. 100,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 50% of what you buyScrape.do$99.00same bill. 750,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 60% of what you buyScrapeOwl$99.00same bill. 473,684 of the included allowance goes unused, 47% of what you buyWebScraping.AI$99.00same bill. 500,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 50% of what you buyBrowserCloud$19.00−80.00 vs ScrapingBot. 14,737 of the included allowance goes unused, 12% of what you buyScrappa$50.00 prepaid−49.00 vs ScrapingBot. 80,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 44% of what you buyScraping Robot$180.00+81.00 vs ScrapingBot. cheapest way to buy that: Business pay-as-you-go, pay as you go at $0.0018 per unit = $180.00 per monthBrowsable$249.00+150.00 vs ScrapingBot. 19,737 of the included allowance goes unused, 16% of what you buyScrapingAnt$249.00+150.00 vs ScrapingBot. 2,000,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 67% of what you buyDecodo Web Scraping API$49.00Older price; excluded from rankings. 63,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 39% of what you buyScrapeOps$99.00Older price; excluded from rankings. cheapest way to buy that: 1M, 1,000,000 included = $99.00 per month

See all 39 products in this category →

Why teams leave ScrapingBot

ScrapingBot’s credit balance represents several very different request classes. Static retrieval consumes one credit, browser rendering consumes five, stealth treatment consumes seventy-five, Google Search consumes ten, and AI extraction adds five to the underlying scrape. A workload that begins with static pages and shifts toward protected rendered targets can consume many times more of its allowance without increasing call count. The documented request timeout also caps each attempt at forty-five seconds. (ScrapingBot documentation, retrieved 2026-07-27; ScrapingBot, retrieved 2026-07-27.)

The public commercial record itself is a reason to pause. The homepage plan grid and documentation publish different included-credit figures, and the homepage presents one recurring free allowance in its grid but a different signup allowance in its FAQ. Failure billing and overage pricing are not published. A buyer that needs a reconciled allowance and unsuccessful-request rule before committing cannot safely fill those gaps with the most favorable number. (ScrapingBot, retrieved 2026-07-27; ScrapingBot documentation, retrieved 2026-07-27.)

Alternatives worth considering

  • ScrapeOwl: Consider it when explicit basic, rendered, residential, and rendered-premium request totals plus a billable-status table are more important than ScrapingBot’s AI and social endpoints. ScrapeOwl bills 404 responses and publishes plan thread limits, giving the buyer a clearer but different operating boundary. (ScrapeOwl documentation, retrieved 2026-07-27; ScrapeOwl pricing, retrieved 2026-07-27.)

  • WebScraping.AI: Look here when AI extraction should remain attached to standard, rendered, residential, or stealth retrieval. Failed requests do not consume credits. Its current pricing table and documentation disagree on some request costs, so this move improves the failure rule but does not eliminate all source reconciliation. (WebScraping.AI, retrieved 2026-07-27; WebScraping.AI documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingBee: Consider it when general scraping, rendering, premium routing, stealth, screenshots, extraction, Google, and commerce endpoints need a published credit guide. Credits do not roll over and JavaScript is enabled by default unless disabled, so the application must set request modes deliberately. (ScrapingBee credit guide, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Scrappa: Look here when one successful request should consume one credit across every listed endpoint and failed requests should be free. That uniform debit is easier to count than ScrapingBot’s static, rendered, stealth, Google, and extraction classes. Scrappa’s endpoint catalog and browser controls are not identical, so the output still needs testing. (Scrappa pricing, retrieved 2026-07-27.)

  • ScraperAPI: Consider it when named page and search targets plus screenshots, rendering, premium routing, and stealth fit the application. It documents major credit costs and chargeable response statuses, but monthly capacity does not roll over and lower plans stop at exhaustion unless upgraded. (ScraperAPI pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScraperAPI credit rules, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Who should stay with ScrapingBot

Stay when the same application uses static HTML, browser rendering, stealth proxies, AI extraction, screenshots, wait controls, browser scenarios, Google Search, and the vendor’s Instagram or TikTok endpoints. The homepage says one account and API key work across its platform-specific APIs, and the plan cards publish concurrency for the current self-serve tiers. If the account dashboard resolves the published allowance conflict and the request mix is measured, keeping that combined product set can avoid several vendor integrations. (ScrapingBot, retrieved 2026-07-27; ScrapingBot documentation, retrieved 2026-07-27.)

What the alternatives do not replace

The standard-page table does not include ScrapingBot’s whole catalog. ScrapeOwl does not provide the same AI and social endpoints. Scrappa’s one-credit rule does not prove matching browser scenarios or returned fields. ScrapingBee, WebScraping.AI, and ScraperAPI have their own mode selection and target definitions. Inventory each current endpoint, include additive AI extraction, identify calls that approach the timeout, and obtain a written allowance and failure rule before using a computed basic-page total to justify migration. (ScrapingBot, retrieved 2026-07-27; ScrapeOwl documentation, retrieved 2026-07-27; Scrappa pricing, retrieved 2026-07-27.)