Home / Web scraping APIs / Spider.cloud
Spider.cloud pricing
Spider.cloud has no public price for 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month; what it does publish, and why that is not a bill, is set out below.
Checked Oct 12, 2026 on Spider.cloud's own pricing page
Your workloadType an exact volume, change the success rate or copy a link to this jobEdit
Every available option was priced in advance from published vendor rules. Changing a control only switches between those checked options; nothing is sent anywhere and no account is needed.
Your job
What Spider.cloud bills you for
What you pay
Every Spider.cloud plan
| Plan | Billed monthly | Billed yearly, per month | Included | Past the allowance | Concurrent requests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pay as you go | not published | not offered | pay per use | $1.00 per GB | not published |
| Unlimited 2 concurrency | $40.00 | not offered | pay per use | not published | 2 |
| Unlimited 25 concurrency | $350.00 | not offered | pay per use | not published | 25 |
| Unlimited 1538 concurrency | $19,994.00 | not offered | pay per use | not published | 1538 |
Spider.cloud is also sold as one of the cloud browsers (200 browser hours a month: no public price) and one of the AI extraction APIs (100,000 AI extraction operations a month: no public price).
About this price and its sources
How Spider.cloud separates pay-as-you-go bandwidth and CPU time from flat concurrency plans, with the remaining gaps.
How the bill builds up
- Base rateNot publishedNo matching published billing rule
- × JavaScript renderingNot publishedSee the stated assumption in the calculation
- × Premium proxyNot requiredNot part of this workload
- ÷ Success rate0.95Failure billing is not published; this is an assumption
- = per 1,000 pages keptTotal unknown
Credits and multipliers
JavaScript rendering
Billed failures
Success rate
Concurrency
Free tier
Renews monthly The bill at your volume
100,000 pages per month · No complete published bill
Read the chart as a table
| Volume | Bill | Offer |
|---|---|---|
| 10,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
| 25,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
| 50,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
| 100,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
| 250,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
| 500,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
| 1,000,000 | No public price | no self-serve plan |
Follow each billed unit
-
Successes you want
100,000 pages
Your stated workload. Every vendor on this site is priced against this same number.
- ÷ 0.95
Attempts you are billed for
105,263 requests
Failure billing is not published, so this assumes all 105,263 attempts are billed.
- ∅
Cash per month
No public price for this job
See the note above.
Bars share one linear scale across the 2 counted stages, so a multiplier shows as length. Units differ by stage and are labelled. Cash is not on that scale.
No public price. The vendor's published terms do not give a complete price for this job.
Published exact bills for comparable products
Same 100,000 JavaScript-rendered pages a month at a 95% success rate, ranked by what you would actually be billed. APIs without a full public price aren't ranked. Showing 6 of 16; see the rest.
What Spider.cloud does not publish
- Spider bills by GB transferred and CPU time, which a page count doesn't tell us, and its Unlimited plan sells concurrency without saying how long a request takes, so we can't price this job.
What Spider.cloud is
Spider.cloud provides crawl, scrape, search, and browser-capable web data endpoints for AI agents and data pipelines. It can return page content and structured or LLM-oriented output while offering JavaScript, stealth, proxy, and AI-related options. It is for developers who want a hosted crawler and scraper but still want a choice between granular infrastructure usage and flat request capacity. Sources: Spider.cloud and Spider.cloud pricing, checked Jul 26, 2026.
Firecrawl, Zyte API, and Apify are the nearest named comparisons. Firecrawl uses operation-specific credits for scrape, crawl, map, search, and extraction; Zyte bills successful requests through target-difficulty tiers and add-ons; Apify charges a platform balance for compute, storage, transfer, proxies, and Actor events. Spider.cloud’s distinguishing choice is between pay-as-you-go bandwidth plus CPU time and Unlimited plans tied to concurrent requests. Sources: Firecrawl pricing, Zyte pricing, Apify pricing, and Spider.cloud pricing, checked Jul 26, 2026.
How billing works
There are two materially different models. Pay-as-you-go adds incoming bandwidth and CPU minutes, so one page has no universal unit cost: page weight and processing time multiply usage. Prepaid top-up balances do not expire. Unlimited replaces those per-request infrastructure meters with a flat plan determined by purchased concurrency and includes standard JavaScript, stealth, and proxy use, while AI features remain separately metered and geolocation is not included. Failed requests are not charged, and Unlimited requests above the concurrency ceiling receive HTTP 429 instead of queueing. The common buying mistake is to treat the vendor’s illustrative basic-scrape amount as a fixed per-page rate, or to assume Unlimited also covers AI features and geolocation. Source: Spider.cloud pricing, checked Jul 26, 2026.
What Spider.cloud does not publish cleanly
- The amount of free signup balance (Spider.cloud pricing, Jul 26, 2026).
- One reconciled Unlimited entry point. The page headline and the detailed concurrency scale show different starting statements (Spider.cloud pricing, Jul 26, 2026).
- A simple per-page conversion for CPU minutes and incoming bandwidth, because both depend on the received page and processing path (Spider.cloud pricing, Jul 26, 2026).
Who it suits
Spider.cloud suits teams that can measure page weight and CPU time or that have stable enough concurrency to choose Unlimited. It is less suitable when procurement needs one fixed cost per received page, or when AI and geolocation must be assumed part of the flat plan. The reason is that the two buying modes optimize for different workload shapes and should not be blended in one estimate. Sources: Spider.cloud and pricing, checked Jul 26, 2026.