Scraping API Prices
Browse pages
Compare every productScraping APIsCloud browsersSERP and searchAI scraping APIsCost to scrape a targetGuidesQuestions & toolsHead to headShort answersCheapest for a jobFree tiersHow we check prices

Home / ValueSERP / Alternatives

ValueSERP alternatives

The first 12 comparable products for 100,000 standard search calls with one default-depth result set per call. Sorted by the published bill and amount, never by who pays us; the full category route includes every relevant product.

Exact12 substitutions priced5 cheaper than ValueSERPLatest recorded source date 2026-07-26

The datum line

$240.00What the rechecked ValueSERP price gives for this job. Older prices do not produce comparative deltas.

The substitution

Search calls100,000
Depth and variantsone default result set; no fan-out
Alternatives without a total0

Priced alternatives

Scrappa$50.00 prepaid−190.00 vs ValueSERP. 80,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 44% of what you buyDataForSEO SERP API$60.00−180.00 vs ValueSERP. cheapest way to buy that: Standard Queue, pay as you go at $0.0006 per unit = $60.00 per monthHasData$99.00−141.00 vs ValueSERP. cheapest way to buy that: Business, 1,000,000 included = $99.00 per monthScrape.do$99.00−141.00 vs ValueSERP. 250,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 20% of what you buyScrapingBot$99.00−141.00 vs ValueSERP. 100,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 9% of what you buyScrapingAnt$249.00+9.00 vs ValueSERP. 2,000,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 67% of what you buySearchApi.io$250.00+10.00 vs ValueSERP. cheapest way to buy that: BigData, 100,000 included = $250.00 per monthSerper.dev$375.00 prepaid+135.00 vs ValueSERP. 400,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 80% of what you buyScavio$500.00+260.00 vs ValueSERP. cheapest way to buy that: Pay as you go, pay as you go at $0.005 per unit = $500.00 per monthserpstack$999.95+759.95 vs ValueSERP. cheapest way to buy that: Business Pro plus 50,000 over the allowance at $0.02 each = $999.95 per monthScrapingDog$90.00Older price; excluded from rankings. 500,000 of the included allowance goes unused, 50% of what you buyOxylabs Web Scraper API$99.00Older price; excluded from rankings. cheapest way to buy that: Starter, $99.00 minimum against $90.00 of usage = $99.00 per month

See all 24 products in this category →

Why teams leave ValueSERP

ValueSERP becomes difficult to approve when the buyer needs a fully reconcilable bill before committing. Its public page presents annual plans with monthly credit allowances, but the entry plan’s displayed total does not agree with its displayed per-credit claim, and the page does not state how many credits one search consumes. The reviewed public material also does not say whether failed searches consume credits. More importantly for a commercial product, the current Traject Data terms say products and services are for personal use only and may not be resold. A team that needs a transparent search billing unit, a documented failure rule, monthly purchasing, or clear commercial and redistribution rights has a specific reason to leave rather than a generic desire to compare prices. (ValueSERP product page, retrieved 2026-07-26; Traject Data terms, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Alternatives worth considering

These are Google-SERP substitutes with a recorded Google-search route. They are not ranked. Decodo is not included in this direct set because its current vendor record exposes standard, premium-proxy, and JavaScript page-result meters, but no Google-search meter that the engine can compare with this workload. (Decodo Web Scraping API pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Bright Data SERP API: Look here when you want a successful-request rule with parsing, unlocking, retries, and bandwidth included in the SERP product. Failed or errored requests and internal retries are excluded from billing in its public documentation. (Bright Data SERP API billing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • DataForSEO SERP API: Consider it when pay-as-you-go delivery through standard, priority, or live queues fits better than an annual allowance. It requires an account deposit, and funds reserved for failed tasks are returned to the balance. (DataForSEO SERP pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; DataForSEO cost explanation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Oxylabs SERP Scraper API: Look here when a successful-result allowance and a Google-specific route are preferable to an unreconciled credit conversion. Its success definition includes target client-error responses, while system-side errors are not billed. (Oxylabs SERP Scraper API, retrieved 2026-07-26; Oxylabs billing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Oxylabs Web Scraper API: Consider the broader Oxylabs product when Google results must share an integration with Amazon, other sites, or JavaScript page retrieval. The Google target has its own recorded meter, but target client-error responses can still be billable successes. (Oxylabs Web Scraper API pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Scale SERP: Look here only when its interface or product behavior fits better and staying inside the Traject Data family is useful. It does not solve ValueSERP’s central transparency problem because the public page also omits the credit-per-search billing unit and failed-search rule, and the same personal-use terms apply. (Scale SERP product page, retrieved 2026-07-26; Traject Data terms, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Scrape.do: Consider it when Google SERPs should sit beside general pages, rendering, residential or mobile routing, Amazon, and extraction in one API. Google uses a target-specific credit bundle, and several target response statuses count as successful. (Scrape.do request costs, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapeOps: Look here when Google retrieval is part of a broader proxy-aggregation workflow that also needs rendering, anti-bot handling, extraction, or protected targets. Its monthly credits do not roll over, but the account can be configured to renew, upgrade, or stop when exhausted. (ScrapeOps request costs, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScraperAPI: Consider it when Google search should share an API with Bing, Amazon, LinkedIn, ordinary pages, screenshots, JavaScript, and stealth routes. Only selected response statuses are charged, but credits reset each billing period and lower plans stop at the allowance unless upgraded. (ScraperAPI credit rules, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScraperAPI pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingAnt: Look here when Google search, general page retrieval, residential routing, and JavaScript belong in the same monthly credit pool. Blocked and error responses are described as unbilled, while the vendor’s public concurrency statements do not fully reconcile. (ScrapingAnt credit costs, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScrapingAnt pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingBee: Consider it when Google results need to coexist with general scraping, JavaScript, premium routing, stealth, extraction, and commerce targets. Its Google route has a fixed credit cost, selected HTTP responses are billable, and monthly credits do not roll over. (ScrapingBee credit guide, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • ScrapingDog: Look here when a collection job spans Google, Google Shopping, commerce sites, social or video targets, screenshots, and extraction. The vendor says failed requests are not charged, although its public documentation does not give a complete billable-status list. (ScrapingDog pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; ScrapingDog documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • SearchApi.io: Consider it when a plain successful HTTP response should equal one monthly-plan request and failed requests should not count. Check its terms before switching because redistribution requires written consent, proprietary notices must remain, and zero retention is limited to enterprise arrangements. (SearchApi.io pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; SearchApi.io terms, retrieved 2026-07-26; Search Analytics API, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • SerpApi: Look here when you want one successful search to consume one search regardless of result count, with cached, errored, and failed searches excluded from the monthly allowance. Its public page offers a much broader plan ladder than ValueSERP’s three published annual tiers. (SerpApi pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; SerpApi FAQ, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Serper.dev: Consider it when prepaid credits with a published validity period fit better than a recurring annual plan. One successful response consumes one credit, which gives the engine a billing unit that ValueSERP’s public page does not provide. (Serper.dev, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • SerpWow: Look here when SerpWow’s request model or feature set is the better fit and a lateral move inside Traject Data is acceptable. Like Scale SERP, it does not cure the missing credit-per-search billing unit, unpublished failed-search treatment, or personal-use term. (SerpWow product page, retrieved 2026-07-26; Traject Data terms, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

  • Zenserp: Consider it when one successful request should consume one monthly-plan search and all of its published SERP types should be included. The vendor lists Google, Google Images, Google Maps, Google News, YouTube, Bing, Yandex, and DuckDuckGo, and says failed errors do not count against the plan. (Zenserp pricing, retrieved 2026-07-26; Zenserp documentation, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

Who should stay with ValueSERP

Stay when the existing job is specifically Google SERP collection and it already depends on ValueSERP’s response formats, location and device controls, scheduled Batches, or delivery to Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob Storage, Alibaba Cloud OSS, or another S3-compatible destination. Staying is also reasonable when its multi-step downloading of pages linked from the first SERP is material, because the product page says those subsequent requests add no extra cost. The safe procurement condition is that the account or contract has resolved the public pricing discrepancy and confirms that the intended use fits the current terms. (ValueSERP product page, retrieved 2026-07-26; Traject Data terms, retrieved 2026-07-26.)

What the alternatives do not replace

The comparison table prices a successful Google search. It does not establish that any alternative reproduces ValueSERP’s JSON, HTML, and CSV outputs, device and location controls, scheduled batch workflow, storage destinations, image extraction, or multi-step linked-page downloading. Some alternatives add other search engines or general scraping routes, but that is not the same as preserving an existing ValueSERP integration. Treat the engine total as the cost layer, then verify schema, localization parameters, batch scheduling, delivery, and contract rights before migrating. (ValueSERP product page, retrieved 2026-07-26.)